Microsoft’s switch to 3-week Sprints increased team anxiety due to greater transparency, exposing inefficiencies but enabling faster, more frequent software delivery.
When Microsoft moved from a two-year delivery cycle to 3-week Sprints, something unexpected happened—teams became terrified.
Not of the work itself, but of the transparency.
Suddenly, it was impossible to hide inefficiencies. Bad code was exposed. Delivery bottlenecks became visible. And that fear? It was real.
But here’s the thing—transparency isn’t the enemy; it’s the only way to improve. The teams that embraced the new way of working went from delivering 24 features per year to shipping multiple times per day.
Fear of failure keeps teams stuck in technical debt. The best teams face it head-on.
Is your organisation ready to embrace transparency?
If you've made it this far, it's worth connecting with our principal consultant and coach, Martin Hinshelwood, for a 30-minute 'ask me anything' call.
We partner with businesses across diverse industries, including finance, insurance, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, technology, engineering, transportation, hospitality, entertainment, legal, government, and military sectors.
Akaditi
Deliotte
Xceptor - Process and Data Automation
Emerson Process Management
Capita Secure Information Solutions Ltd
Sage
Freadom
Philips
New Signature
Epic Games
CR2
Cognizant Microsoft Business Group (MBG)
Hubtel Ghana
MacDonald Humfrey (Automation) Ltd.
Kongsberg Maritime
Boeing
Alignment Healthcare
Healthgrades
Nottingham County Council
Ghana Police Service
New Hampshire Supreme Court
Department of Work and Pensions (UK)
Washington Department of Transport
Washington Department of Enterprise Services
Bistech
Lockheed Martin
Milliman
Graham & Brown
Illumina
MacDonald Humfrey (Automation) Ltd.