If your business truly understood the risk of technical debt, you wouldn’t accept any of it.
There’s a myth that “some level of technical debt is manageable.” But let’s be clear—technical debt is 100% risk. It’s an unhedged fund with no asset securing it, no insurance to mitigate it. The cost isn’t just in future refactoring; it’s in lost time, lost agility, and lost opportunities.
At Microsoft, TFS was delivered on a two-year cycle. By 2012, with 600 engineers, they were shipping just 24 features a year. Technical debt had turned a powerhouse into a bottleneck. It wasn’t until they embraced 3-week Sprints and tackled the underlying debt that they regained agility.
This isn’t just an engineering problem. It’s a business problem. If you think you can hide technical debt in a cost centre forever, think again.
How does your organisation treat technical debt? As a calculated risk or an unrecognised liability?
If you've made it this far, it's worth connecting with our principal consultant and coach, Martin Hinshelwood, for a 30-minute 'ask me anything' call.
We partner with businesses across diverse industries, including finance, insurance, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, technology, engineering, transportation, hospitality, entertainment, legal, government, and military sectors.
Jack Links
Philips
CR2
Schlumberger
Teleplan
Lean SA
Healthgrades
Boeing
Akaditi
Alignment Healthcare
Lockheed Martin
Slicedbread
Freadom
DFDS
Capita Secure Information Solutions Ltd
New Signature
Bistech
Flowmaster (a Mentor Graphics Company)
Washington Department of Enterprise Services
Nottingham County Council
Department of Work and Pensions (UK)
Royal Air Force
New Hampshire Supreme Court
Washington Department of Transport
Xceptor - Process and Data Automation
Higher Education Statistics Agency
Slicedbread
Epic Games
Emerson Process Management
Kongsberg Maritime