We don’t have time for automation—but manual testing slows releases and quality

Manual Testing vs Automation in Releases

Manual testing limits release speed and quality, while automation enables faster, more reliable software delivery by reducing regressions and tester workload.

Published on 7 April 2025

Written by Martin Hinshelwood

1 minute read

https://nkdagility.com/resources/f6S9lWfTQaQ

Every time I hear, “We don’t have time for automation,” I know exactly what’s coming next.

Regressions slowing down releases
Testers overwhelmed with manual work
Bugs slipping through because “there wasn’t time” to retest everything
A release cycle that feels like a game of Russian roulette

Manual testing is not scalable. If you’re serious about agility, you need automation. Otherwise, your “fast-moving” team is only as fast as the slowest manual test run.

Automated tests are the only way to keep up with change while ensuring quality. No more excuses.

What’s holding your team back from full automation?

Also published on: LinkedIn

Related Blog

Connect with Martin Hinshelwood

If you've made it this far, it's worth connecting with our principal consultant and coach, Martin Hinshelwood, for a 30-minute 'ask me anything' call.

Our Happy Clients

We partner with businesses across diverse industries, including finance, insurance, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, technology, engineering, transportation, hospitality, entertainment, legal, government, and military sectors.